In another not-so-surprising diatribe, we see even more negativity and bashing in regards to Tom Osborne. Trainwreck, the admin over at the bigredboard had the following to say:
I resent Osborne's lying, his hypocrisy, and his incompetence. I resented them before he became AD, and I resent them now. I resent the fact that he spent four years keeping his distance from the program because he was butthurt about Soich getting fired. His first coaching search was confined to coaches whose offices were in the same hallway as his, and even then he found the third-best candidate. His second search was no search at all, and I resent that we have wasted millions of dollars on his bid for revenge firings only to end up with a lackluster staff that wouldn't pass muster at most mid-major schools.
Gee trainwreck, a little jealous that someone else might be trying to corner the market on lying, hypocrisy, and incompetence? Try asking him for specific examples. You won't get any. A lackluster staff? So will you discontinue bigredboard then and support some other team? Perhaps a chess club or a boy scout troop?
Let us never forget that the bigredboard is the most positive Husker board on the net!!!!!
Tuesday, January 08, 2008
Monday, January 07, 2008
Husker Hypocrites
One just needs to check the antics of Bigredboard to see what the text book definition of hypocrite is. They spent years defending Steve Pederson and Bill Callahan no matter what the blunders were, and they raked anyone over the coals who didn't unconditionally support NU. Well, now that Tom Osborne is back, BRB members sound exactly like those they ripped on.
These talking points below come from two charter members of the Tradition Coalition, and make for great reading. I'd like to add to point #3 that perhaps Blankman should stick to watching professional wrestling.
#1 - According to coaches of all programs and staff members throughout the athletic department, Tom is doing a fantastic job as AD. Would you like to point out some specific areas where Tom has failed since taking the job? No, I'm guessing you would rather speak in rediculous generalities, with absolutely no proof to support your stance. It better fits your agenda.
#2 - Blah, blah, blah. I think when given the choice, I will take Tom's word on the merits of the walkon program over Eisenhart and Rice. He has just slightly more experience and knowledge in the topic. See #3 to better understand why the walk on program IS important to the success of Nebraska.
#3 - Blankman, all you are trying to create here is a strawman. You say yourself that you don't lend much credence to the rankings. That's all many others are saying. Recruiting is important to the success of the program. Tom knows this, as does Bo and his staff. But, they also know (as apparently you don't) that there are some good quality players here in state. Players that, given the choice, would rather take a walkon shot at being Husker than going elsewhere. Players that are deeply invested in the Huskers, as they are the team they have dreamed about playing for since their youth. Players that, given a chance, will give their all for the team.While Nebraska has never relied on West Point and Broken Bow for their star players, they have relied on towns like Duncan, Ponca, Plainview, Hyannis, Pierce, Fremont, Battle Creek, Wausa, St. Edward, Tecumseh, Burr, Wood River, Funk, Norfolk, Columbus, Brainard, Monroe...well, I could go on and on. Perhaps, Blankboy, you should take the time to actually review the history of Nebraska football and see where some of our best players actually called home.
#4 - Strawman part deux. I think I have yet to see ANYONE state that we should only recruit players from Nebraska. And, if hearing the word Nebraska bothers you so much, maybe you should move across the river to Council Bluffs.
#5 - Doing things the "Nebraska way" has absolutely no reference to the type of offense we run. It has nothing to do with defensive schemes. And, the fact that you think that the notion is "complete tripe" shows that you just simply don't get it, and probably never will. "Not the victory but the action, not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory." I seriously think you would rather that quote read, "A win is a win, it doesn't matter how you play the game." Callahan? "One game, one season." Fucking Hillbillies. Throat slash. "Crusty old fuck." He most certainly did not understand the "Nebraska way", same as you.
Fortunately for Nebraska Football, there is only one of you. Unfortunately, there are a few more "fans" like you. And, that is sad.
From another Tradition Coalition charter member:
Here's a general response to those who claim BC "proved NU can recruit talent" or "BC was, if nothing else, a great recruiter": Why do people keep trying to say that "Callahan proved you can draw talent to Lincoln"?
BOB D, TOM O, and FRANK S all PROVED that long before bill showed up. The only thing that bill proved is that NU can lose and misuse the talent it does recruit quite quickly (insert list of 4/5 star transfers here).
bill callahan was not only our worst coach in history; he was arguably one of the worst recruiters (in terms of his evaluations and keeping players on campus) that we've had. He certainly can't be talked about as a great recruiter because the results on field so far speak for themselves.
Convincing a kid to attend a school requires only a great used car salesman.
Bringing a kid who fits your system, understands his role, is willing to work, and eventually pays dividends ON THE FIELD (not in the Rivals rankings) is what makes someone a GREAT recruiter.
bill was a car salesman.
Bo and his staff will be recruiters.
These talking points below come from two charter members of the Tradition Coalition, and make for great reading. I'd like to add to point #3 that perhaps Blankman should stick to watching professional wrestling.
#1 - According to coaches of all programs and staff members throughout the athletic department, Tom is doing a fantastic job as AD. Would you like to point out some specific areas where Tom has failed since taking the job? No, I'm guessing you would rather speak in rediculous generalities, with absolutely no proof to support your stance. It better fits your agenda.
#2 - Blah, blah, blah. I think when given the choice, I will take Tom's word on the merits of the walkon program over Eisenhart and Rice. He has just slightly more experience and knowledge in the topic. See #3 to better understand why the walk on program IS important to the success of Nebraska.
#3 - Blankman, all you are trying to create here is a strawman. You say yourself that you don't lend much credence to the rankings. That's all many others are saying. Recruiting is important to the success of the program. Tom knows this, as does Bo and his staff. But, they also know (as apparently you don't) that there are some good quality players here in state. Players that, given the choice, would rather take a walkon shot at being Husker than going elsewhere. Players that are deeply invested in the Huskers, as they are the team they have dreamed about playing for since their youth. Players that, given a chance, will give their all for the team.While Nebraska has never relied on West Point and Broken Bow for their star players, they have relied on towns like Duncan, Ponca, Plainview, Hyannis, Pierce, Fremont, Battle Creek, Wausa, St. Edward, Tecumseh, Burr, Wood River, Funk, Norfolk, Columbus, Brainard, Monroe...well, I could go on and on. Perhaps, Blankboy, you should take the time to actually review the history of Nebraska football and see where some of our best players actually called home.
#4 - Strawman part deux. I think I have yet to see ANYONE state that we should only recruit players from Nebraska. And, if hearing the word Nebraska bothers you so much, maybe you should move across the river to Council Bluffs.
#5 - Doing things the "Nebraska way" has absolutely no reference to the type of offense we run. It has nothing to do with defensive schemes. And, the fact that you think that the notion is "complete tripe" shows that you just simply don't get it, and probably never will. "Not the victory but the action, not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory." I seriously think you would rather that quote read, "A win is a win, it doesn't matter how you play the game." Callahan? "One game, one season." Fucking Hillbillies. Throat slash. "Crusty old fuck." He most certainly did not understand the "Nebraska way", same as you.
Fortunately for Nebraska Football, there is only one of you. Unfortunately, there are a few more "fans" like you. And, that is sad.
From another Tradition Coalition charter member:
Here's a general response to those who claim BC "proved NU can recruit talent" or "BC was, if nothing else, a great recruiter": Why do people keep trying to say that "Callahan proved you can draw talent to Lincoln"?
BOB D, TOM O, and FRANK S all PROVED that long before bill showed up. The only thing that bill proved is that NU can lose and misuse the talent it does recruit quite quickly (insert list of 4/5 star transfers here).
bill callahan was not only our worst coach in history; he was arguably one of the worst recruiters (in terms of his evaluations and keeping players on campus) that we've had. He certainly can't be talked about as a great recruiter because the results on field so far speak for themselves.
Convincing a kid to attend a school requires only a great used car salesman.
Bringing a kid who fits your system, understands his role, is willing to work, and eventually pays dividends ON THE FIELD (not in the Rivals rankings) is what makes someone a GREAT recruiter.
bill was a car salesman.
Bo and his staff will be recruiters.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)